Dogme 95: A Small Nation’s Response to Globalization

 

POLITOLOGISKE STUDIER - ÅRG. 4 NR. 4  - FILM OG POLITIK -OKTOBER 2001

Af Mette Hjort

To date discussions of Dogme 95 have focused largely on rule following and the implications of creativity under constraint for the renewal of film aesthetics. In this kind of account, it has frequently been a matter of situating Dogme 95 in relation to a larger manifesto tradition, and of pointing out that the Danish initiative, unlike most manifestos, foregrounds formal, rather than political issues. A quite different response to Dogme 95 insists that it should be considered neither in political nor aesthetic terms, but rather as a successful instance of marketing or as a fairly cynical publicity stunt. In this piece I take issue with both of these positions by arguing that Dogme 95 does, in fact, involve a serious political dimension which becomes apparent once the implications of the manifesto are viewed in light of the realities of small nations and minor cinemas in an increasingly globalized world. Dogme 95, I argue, is a small nation’s response to globalization, and warrants attention precisely because it emphasizes neither heritage issues, nor nationalism, but rather participation within a decidedly international framework.



© 2001 | Copyright Tusch Design | Institut for Statskundskab ved Københavns Universitet